Accessibility Review · Example edition
Make the finding specific enough to fix.
This fictional review illustrates findings on a document index. It is a sample review record, not a certification of conformance or a claim about a live site.
| Finding | Affected task | Proposed change | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclear link text | Choose the correct reference | Use the document title | Read links out of context |
| Status uses color only | Identify approved entries | Add visible status text | Review without color cues |
| Focus hard to see | Navigate by keyboard | Use a clear focus outline | Complete keyboard walkthrough |
| Dense mobile table | Read ownership details | Allow local table scrolling | Check at narrow width |
Describe the barrier
A useful finding explains what the person is trying to do and how the interface prevents or complicates it. Attach a concrete example rather than a vague instruction to improve accessibility.
Check the repair
Repeat the affected task after the change. Combine automated checks with keyboard review and appropriate assistive-technology testing; no single tool establishes complete accessibility.
Keep the scope visible
Record the pages, components, environments, and methods actually reviewed. In a formal assessment, map findings to the current applicable standard using verified references.