Service Comparison · Example edition
Choose the support the project actually needs.
This fictional studio offers three engagement shapes. The comparison helps a client choose between a focused review, a guided sprint, and a complete website project. Prices are intentionally omitted until scope is known.
| Option | Includes | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Review | One existing flow and written findings | A team ready to make its own changes |
| Sprint | Discovery and one tested direction | An unclear problem with a deadline |
| Website | Five-page design, build, and handover | A business launching its first site |
Compare the responsibility
In a review, the client implements the changes. A sprint produces a direction and supporting evidence. The website engagement includes implementation within a defined page scope.
Questions before choosing
Who can supply content? Who will approve the work? Is the deadline fixed? The answers can change the suitable engagement more than the number of features listed.
A sensible recommendation
For the café example, the website engagement fits because the owner needs a complete handover and has no internal build team. Revisit the recommendation if the client already has a reliable implementation partner.