Technology Assessment · Example edition
Evaluate the fit against the actual workload.
This fictional assessment compares a static document site, a wiki, and a custom application for a team handover library. It describes approaches without claiming current library or vendor capabilities.
| Requirement | Static site | Wiki | Custom application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Readable reference pages | Fits the example | Fits the example | Requires implementation |
| Frequent multi-author edits | Build workflow needed | Primary workflow to test | Requires implementation |
| Custom operational actions | Separate service needed | Extension to investigate | Possible with added scope |
| Maintenance owner | Publisher | Content administrator | Engineering team |
Start with requirements
The team needs readable reference pages and occasional updates. It has not established a need for custom operational actions, so those should not dominate the first decision.
Risk to examine
A custom application can create a larger maintenance obligation than the content problem warrants. A wiki may fit editing needs but still requires ownership and review conventions.
Trial recommendation
Test the smallest approach against two real handovers. Verify current capabilities and security requirements from primary documentation before selecting an actual product or technical stack.